![]() As well as osteological examinations to determine age, sex, height, state of health, i.e. The mass grave was block-lifted and then comprehensively examined at the State Museum of Prehistory in Halle (Saale). Further archaeological research confirmed that the dead had been soldiers from the Battle of Lützen (1632). Based on its geographical location and on the results obtained from archaeological examinations carried out in the area, the grave could be dated to the Thirty Years War (1618–1648). One such mass grave was discovered in 2011 at Lützen, Saxony-Anhalt (Germany). ![]() They allow us to reconstruct the circumstances surrounding the soldiers’ deaths and provide information on the hostilities that occurred on the battlefield. In studying mass graves from a military context, the injury types and patterns are significant. Besides cultural historical evidence and artefacts, the human remains of those who have fallen in battle also provide invaluable information. Battlefield archaeology faces the task of compiling an historical analysis of a battle and of gathering all the available facts. “He has been misrepresented as just a king with scoliosis.Contemporary accounts of battles are often incomplete or even erroneous because they reflect the-often biased-viewpoints of the authors. “This opens up a new posthumous discussion about Richard’s legacy,” the historian said. Still, Gunn said, a more complex picture of the king is now emerging. Gunn said it was unlikely anyone would ever learn the truth behind the most damaging rumors about Richard - that he murdered his young nephews to hang onto his crown. “When Richard took the throne, he said his brother Edward should never have been king because he was illegitimate,” said Steven Gunn, a tutor in history at Oxford University. Other academics said history is littered with claims and counter-claims of royal legitimacy. Researchers said it was the first time there was scientific evidence that questioned medieval lines of succession in the monarchy. “We are not in any way indicating that Her Majesty (Elizabeth II) shouldn’t be on the throne,” Schurer said. He said England’s current royal family - which has a line of descent from the House of Tudor - should not be worried. Still, Kevin Schurer, pro vice chancellor of the University of Leicester and another study author, said claims to the throne are based on more than simply having royal blood and also rest on other things such as battlefield victories and royal marriages. While researchers weren’t able to say where on the family tree the adultery occurred, they said the findings potentially raise questions about the legitimacy of Henry V, Henry VI and the entire Tudor dynasty, including Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. They found no match, a discovery that could throw the nobility of some royals into question. Scientists also compared the skeleton’s DNA to samples from living relatives on Richard’s father’s side. The research was published Tuesday in the journal, Nature Communications. With no contemporary paintings of the king available, they compared their findings to the earliest known painting of him, which depicts the monarch with light brown hair and blue eyes, painted about 25 years after his death. King Richard III APīased on the skeleton’s DNA, King and colleagues hypothesized that Richard had blue eyes and blond hair in childhood, which darkened with age. When she and colleagues compared the skeleton’s DNA obtained from the ground-up powder of one tooth and a leg bone to samples provided by a 14th cousin on Richard’s maternal side, they found a perfect match. “The probability that this is Richard is 99.999 percent,” said Turi King, a geneticist at the University of Leicester who led the research. In the new study - probably the oldest forensic case ever solved - scientists compared DNA from the skeleton to living relatives and analyzed DNA data identifying eye and hair color, which they matched to the earliest known portrait of the king. Richard was the last English monarch to die on a battlefield, in 1485. The bones of the 15th-century king were dug up in the city of Leicester in 2012, and experts have published initial data suggesting they belong to Richard, including an analysis of his curved spine and the injuries that killed him. LONDON - Scientists say there is “overwhelming evidence” that a skeleton found under a parking lot is that of England’s King Richard III, but their DNA testing also has raised questions about the nobility of some of his royal successors. Jesus, Cleopatra 'selfies' generated by AI go viral: 'Hilarious' Hallucinogenic drugs found in 3,000-year-old human hair believed to belong to ancient shamans Netflix accused of 'blackwashing' Cleopatra: ‘She was light-skinned’ One of last 2 USS Arizona survivors dead at 102
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |